If cloning human beings became possible, which ethical question would be most likely to arise?

• A. They would be treated as non-human property
• B. They would be considered full humans with the same rights
• C. They would require lifelong monitoring
• D. They could be prohibited from marriage

Answer: (B)

The main issue here is how cloning would affect our understanding of personhood and rights. If human cloning became possible, the ethical question most likely to arise is whether a clone should be treated as a person with the same moral and legal rights as any other human being. The strongest case for saying yes—clones deserve the same rights—rests on the idea that human dignity and moral status come from being human, not from how or why a person was created. In most ethical and legal traditions, equal rights, autonomy, and protection from discrimination apply to all humans regardless of genetic similarity or origin, so recognizing clones as full persons with the same rights aligns with those principles.

Other considerations—such as viewing clones as property, requiring lifelong monitoring, or restricting marriage—reflect potential policy or social concerns, but they do not address the fundamental question of whether a clone is deserving of equal personhood and rights.