IoT devices should be described as which of the following?

Prepare for the DSST Ethics In Technology Exam with comprehensive study resources. Utilize flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each accompanied by hints and explanations. Gear up for your exam success!

Multiple Choice

IoT devices should be described as which of the following?

Explanation:
IoT devices should be described as stable, secure, and trustworthy. When these devices operate in people’s homes and workplaces, they manage personal data and sometimes control critical functions. That makes security, reliability, and trustworthiness essential: they should be designed to resist tampering, protect privacy, provide reliable performance, and allow safe updates and accountability. Describing them as secure-by-design and trustworthy reflects the ethical obligation to protect users and data, not just the technical convenience of connectivity. Describing them as insecure and easily accessible would normalize vulnerability, which undermines user safety and privacy. Size or complexity does not determine ethics or trust, so calling them large and complex misses the core expectation. Labeling them as cheap and disposable implies a low commitment to security and responsibility, which is inappropriate for devices that interact with personal data and critical systems.

IoT devices should be described as stable, secure, and trustworthy. When these devices operate in people’s homes and workplaces, they manage personal data and sometimes control critical functions. That makes security, reliability, and trustworthiness essential: they should be designed to resist tampering, protect privacy, provide reliable performance, and allow safe updates and accountability. Describing them as secure-by-design and trustworthy reflects the ethical obligation to protect users and data, not just the technical convenience of connectivity.

Describing them as insecure and easily accessible would normalize vulnerability, which undermines user safety and privacy. Size or complexity does not determine ethics or trust, so calling them large and complex misses the core expectation. Labeling them as cheap and disposable implies a low commitment to security and responsibility, which is inappropriate for devices that interact with personal data and critical systems.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy